Jeremy's Comments on the "Tonight" Programme aired 29.03.12

“The ITV 1 ‘Tonight’ programme on the 29th March 2012 gave the viewer a good insight into the new ballistics evidence, pathology evidence and new forensic matters relating to a sound moderator. My trial in 1986 centered on a sound moderator and the Judge told the jury: “It’s a fact, the sound moderator was on the rifle during a struggle in the kitchen between Nevill Bamber and his assailant.” The Judge, we now know, was completely wrong to tell the jury this was as ‘fact’ as no evidence exists to suggest that a sound moderator featured in this incident at all...." Read the full document here

Latest Media on Jeremy's Case

Tune in for the “Tonight Programme” on ITV1 at 7:30pm tonight to see the latest evidence by documentary maker Mark Williams-Thomas, he has written a piece about the programme – read it here. Listen to Mark Williams-Thomas talking about his documentary on radio here (at 1 Hour 20 min)

Eric Allison has also written a piece for the Guardian, including the publication of letters between the Police and CPS and it is currently the ‘most viewed page in 24 hours” - read the articles and view the documents on their site here. Of key importance is PDF page 4 handwritten, where it says "I also agree burglary charges can be withdrawn" which would suggest that Julie Smerchanski (nee Mugford) was charged with burglary.

The CCRC have still not made their decision the Commissioners are meeting to make the decision sometime during April.

See our affiliate web site which includes pages on:

• Julie Mugford – and her NOTW deal
• Homophobia – attitudes towards Jeremy and his friends in 1985
• Ann & Peter Eaton – Living in the Crime Scene
• Robert Boutflour – And the crucial jury question about motives and inheritance
• David Boutlour – At court stumbles to tell how Sheila attended a shooting party with a gun.
• Anthony Pargeter – Where was his gun and moderator on the night of the tragedy?
• Jeremy Bamber – coping with the tragedy
• Psychological report – Jeremy’s latest review by Prof Vincent Egan
• Character Witnesses – never used at trial
• Matthew MacDonald – alleged hit man

Jeremy is in good spirits and is looking forward to hearing good news in April

Thanks for your support, for and on behalf of Jeremy.

"What Bob Woffinden didn't consider"

Those of you who read Bob Woffinden’s article yesterday might want to consider the following:

How does a telephone found by a witness during September over a month after the killings counteract the following evidence which he did not assess when making his judgements:

•It doesn’t illustrate that Sheila was not alive in the house
•It does not counteract the testimony of officers calling to her as they heard her moving around
•Why doesn’t his investigation show that Sheila was not found downstairs in the kitchen
•What of the numerous independent logs stating that the body of a man and a women were found in the kitchen is he proposing that a woman dead for over seven and a half hours moved herself upstairs from the kitchen?
•How does it counteract the conversation with someone inside the farm?
•What about the police outside for almost four hours with a megaphone?
•And of the movement in the window seen by Bews?
•How does he explain the ‘siege’ situation?
•How does the phone explain a dead woman bleeding for over seven hours photographed with her blood still wet?
•And what about the hour missing from the radio logs at the scene why would that be?
•What about the handwritten statements and pocket books from the scene which remain undisclosed?
•How does a telephone in the 2002 appeal ruling have any bearing on evidence released since 2004?

And of course finally why doesn't Bob address the sound moderator which was found tampered with and all of the documents backdated. How can one sound moderator be in two places at once?

Remember Bob did not present a piece based on balanced research, he did not have access to the comprehensive number of Defence documents, despite us offering them to him several times.

To find out the truth based on the evidence about the phones at WHF click here

An engineer took away one of the phones from the farm

We were disappointed to see the article in the Mail by Bob Woffinden. I would like to say that he has not had access to any of the case documents that we hold, despite us offering them to him. I dont understand what has made him change his view point because it certainly is not 'new' evidence.

There had been problems with the phones at WHF because of a storm and an engineer took away one of the phones from the house and this is why the phones were moved around. The idea that Jeremy put on a wet suit is ridiculous to say the least and is something that Robert Boutflour suggested in his diary. It's a shame that Bob has written this article but I guess he was easily misled without looking at the original documentary evidence.

"New Evidence Proves Unfair Trial"

Today saw the release of further evidence into the media with Channel 4's Johnny Mcdevitt carrying out a thoroughly investigative and strong report into the case evidence in preparation for the CCRC commissioners meeting on Monday 31st January.

There has been an influx of media interest and there is set to be a number of articles in the news over the coming week.

Jeremy is said to be very pleased that some of the evidence has started to surface and he wanted to thank Channel 4 for their accuracy and careful handling in the presentation of material. The evidence presented by Channel 4 is just the beginning of a mountain of documents which have constructed a cast iron case for the Defence. It is now not a matter of if Jeremy is released but when.

The CCRC have stated yesterday that the commissioners will meet as planned on Monday 31st January and are hoping to make a decision at this time. Of course Jeremy is also mindful that the commissioners might not be able to make a decision either way if they require further information and there is always the possibility that a decision may be deferred again.

Jeremy says "Thanks for your continued support everyone, and please if you can re-tweet my tweets"

"I am proud that all of us work collectively and with unity in one direction"

"It is not easy working and campaigning for someone for almost 26 long years and I wanted to say a very special thank you to those people who have made a huge effort and a very big difference to me over the years these include: Scott Lomax, Mike Teskowski and Tracy Brazier, and in more recent years Tracy Williams, Mark Cropper, Sarah Hanover and other campaigners both old and new who wish to remain nameless but have done so much for me.

I am also aware that it is a heavy burden of responsibility for anyone to carry over a long period and there are a large number of paper documents dispersed across many different counties. This brought the need for an electronic document management system which is primarily for use by my lawyers. The Mark and Sarah are the administrators of this document share have kindly offered their services free of charge to implement a system which would cost thousands and it has been done in a relatively short space of time. They do not carry out research in a way that other campaigners do and their role is purely administrative.

I also wanted Mark & Sarah to web publish the latest evidence presented from my CCRC application on the internet in a user friendly format. They have to work within the restrictions and confines of the law as do my legal team, they cannot link to other web sites which do not meet legal obligations.

My apologies if anyone has been confused by disclaimers recently made on this or any other site which was an oversight on my part and not anyone else. Mark and Sarah strictly adhered to my requests at all times. They do not make decisions on my behalf but are merely the facilitators of the administrative actions I would carry out myself had I not been imprisoned.

Thank you to all of you for your concerns and kindness in recent days and I am proud that all of us work collectively and with unity in one direction - towards my freedom and good news on 31st January."

OFFICIAL OUTLET FOR EVIDENCE

THE COMMENTS ON OUR BLOG HERE AND ON WWW.JEREMY-BAMBER.CO.UK ARE THE OFFICIAL LINE OF JEREMY BAMBER. WE CAN SUBSTANTIATE ALL CLAIMS MADE WITH DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WE CANNOT MAKE COMMENT OR TAKE RESPONSIBILITY OR THE CLAIMS MADE BY OTHER WEBSITES ON JEREMY BAMBER.

"Police logs have given us a huge breakthrough to understanding why the crime scene was re staged"

“Kind thanks to all of my friends and campaigners for the cards sent to me for my 50th birthday. Of course I didn’t ever imagine that would I still be in prison for a crime I didn’t commit on this day but it won’t be long before justice is done and I am released. There are many people who should be arrested and charged with fabricating evidence in my case but despite my requests to Essex Police based on the evidence, still there has been no action taken and they tell me that they await further instruction from the CCRC.

There has been a discovery of a 4 boxes of missing documents and we are keen to get these scanned. The guys at the office have already started sending these through to me and uploading them to the document cloud. I am very keen to see many contemporaneous action reports and property registers as many of these wont have been edited. A large number of statements of course have been edited and the list continues to grow.

The most exciting discovery came not from this new find of documents but from some papers in my own archives which I hadn’t looked at for many years. These logs show the reason why the police re-staged the crime scene over and over but I can’t give out detail on these at the moment.

Our work on Twitter has had profound effects with us receiving emails from different types of media outlets both in the UK and USA alike, we are currently working with new contacts on the latest material in my case. The guys have been tweeting on my behalf and I have also seen print outs of all material which is published on the web by campaigners.

I also wanted to say thanks to some people who have recently become involved in carrying out support in an administrative capacity which has helped enormously in handling the large amount of work which is now in operation.

I await both a decision from the European Court of Human Rights on my whole life tariff and also from the CCRC on the 31st January when I am told the commissioners will meet again.”

"He is the only one who, to this day, protests his innocence"

Sunday the 18th of July saw the Sunday Sport publish an article on Jeremy’s case which was well written and researched. Jeremy was pleased with the accuracy of the piece written by the Sport’s Assistant Editor Simon Dean. The article came in the early stages of a relentless campaign which is growing in momentum on a daily basis.

Supporters have this week been writing to the media regarding Jeremy’s case and another supporter issued a poster to all media outlets under the title of ‘How did he do it?’ which brings home the reality that Sheila Caffell died much later than 3.30am and also highlights the fact that a time of death for Sheila was never established.

The abundance of anomalies in this case is mounting, and more evidence is planned for release in the coming weeks. If you are astounded at the evidence so far be set to see more fabricated evidence by Essex Police and further documents of Jeremy’s innocence.

MOJ back down over FaceBook

As of 17th June the Ministry of Justice have allowed Jeremy to have conversation with anyone who operates a facebook site supporting him. For 14 months in all communications Jeremy was unable to discuss anything to do with Facebook with his supporters.

It was only after pursing legal action that the Ministry agreed to Jeremy's communication and involvement in Facebook. Jeremy is 'delighted' about this as the group is valuable as an outlet for his campaign and also as a forum where supporters can discuss issues over the evidence.

The campaign is going from strength to strength with the launch of Jeremy's blogger and this site coupled with his official site, things are really taking shape for one last push to get an innocent man to freedom!

"Guilty as hell?"

This article was recently published in the Essex Newspaper, The Daily Gazette.

It's interesting that David Boutfour (Bamber's Cousin) has mistakenly said that "Some months after the horror he found a silencer in a gun cupboard at the house" because in court he testified that he found the silencer on the 10th August, just three days after the killings.

The new evidence submitted to the CCRC shows that the scratches made by the silencer in the mantle were not present in the photographs taken immediately after the killings, but only in those taken 34 days after. There are also additional documents which support the findings of Mr Peter Suthurst the court sepcialist.

Jeremy Bamber speaks on Talk Radio 22nd April 1995

"The Problem with dealing with anyone's case on a specific is that there is a lot more to the actual case than you're able to give across on the radio, and even through the media, it only, often, just portrays a small part. Now in my particular case I am wholly innocent of the crimes that I was convicted of and have been fighting my case since I first came to prison, since I was first arrested. . . "

View the whole transcript